Former Governor of Okinawa Masahide Ota: Maher’s remarks represent his true feelings
March 12, 2011, Ryukyu Shimpo
Former Governor of Okinawa Masahide Ota discusses what may lie behind the disparaging remarks about Okinawa made by Kevin Maher, who was subsequently removed from his position as Director of the Office of Japanese Affairs in the US State Department.
On my way back to the Peace Research Center in Naha, I learned through a special edition published by a local Okinawan newspaper that Kevin Maher, Director of the Office of Japanese Affairs at the US State Department, had been sacked for the highly discriminatory remarks he made about Okinawa and Japan in general.
Our office staff were so pleased that they shouted with joy when I told them the news – clearly this was no ordinary occurrence.
That Maher was removed from his position is no surprise. Not only did he put his foot in his mouth in this recent case, but he also has a track record of making such verbal gaffes – statements that undoubtedly represent his true feelings. Be that as it may, he still attempted to blame the students who took the notes on his lecture for misquoting him.
As it happens, those same students came to my Center in Naha, where I talked to them for about two hours about military bases in Okinawa. I found them to be serious young people, certainly not the kind of people who would produce irresponsible records of Maher’s comments. It also seems that the contents of their notes all matched.
Kevin Maher is the only consul general to serve in Okinawa whom locals demanded should to leave the islands due to his repeated provocative remarks during his posting there.
I met Maher when he was serving as a military security officer in the US Embassy in Tokyo. I made representations to him about settling the issue of the military bases in Okinawa, but found myself disagreeably surprised at his high-handed and one-sided remarks on the matter. I realized then that as long as he was in charge of security issues, the relationship between Japan and United States would only deteriorate, making it impossible for the matter of US military bases in Okinawa to be resolved.
Maher not seeing Okinawa as belonging to Japan, a sovereign nation meant that he was viewing it as either United States territory or occupied land, and so one can only assume that he must have viewed Japan as tributary nation of United States.
But we miss the true nature of the issue if we attribute the cause of this incident merely to Maher’s personal predilections. A key player in the negotiations on the US Marine Corps Air Station Futenma relocation plan, Maher is an advocate of moving the facilities in question to Cape Henoko in Nago City in the northern area of Okinawa, where Camp Schwab already exists. If we see this as an opportunity to highlight the reality of the situation in Okinawa, we should focus on the bigger issue that exists in the background, namely, that both the United States and Japanese governments implement discriminatory policy towards Okinawa. We need to ask ourselves for whom and for what was the Japan-US Security Treaty created and sustained and to carry out a comprehensive examination of the process of its coming into existence and its actual contribution to both countries. While the Treaty was concluded between the governments of the United States and Japan, it cannot be denied that they maintain it at the expense of Okinawa. The people of Japan should recognize this and move to do away with the treaty if it continues to place too great a burden on Okinawa.
Maher’s verbal gaffe reflects his frustration that the Futenma relocation plan, which he had been advocating, has not gone quite to plan. While we must of course take issue with his discriminatory remarks, it is even more important for us to look closely at the validity of the Futenma relocation plan, which Maher had been so fervently promoting. Both the United States and Japanese governments continue to claim that the US Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, which is currently located in the middle of a densely populated area, needs to be relocated to the more sparsely populated Cape Henoko, in Nago City. However, experience tells us that crime and accidents are by-products of military bases, so there is no guarantee that people’s lives will not be placed at risk if we build a new military base in Henoko. If we agree with the logic that holds that a single human life is more valuable than the earth itself, then every human life is of equal value. In that respect, the issue of relocating the military base should not be discussed in terms of the number of people who might, or might not, lose their lives due to crimes and accidents.
Since its reversion to Japanese sovereignty, Okinawa has witnessed more than 9000 crimes and accidents related to US military forces. Of those, 497 have been caused by US military aircraft, with US military personnel committing 5634 crimes and causing 2401 traffic accidents. Based on this reality, the rejection by the people of Okinawa of the relocation of the air station to Cape Henoko, reflects their acknowledgment of the equality of all human life.
Kevin Maher’s statements provide the people of the rest of Japan with an opportunity to share the same values with the people of Okinawa.
(English Translation by T&CT, Mark Ealey）
Next Article:Resort Weddings increase to 8189 in Okinawa
- Colonialist attitudes behind the ex-US Japan desk diplomat’s derogatory remarks about Okinawans
- Okinawa Governor denies a Japan-U.S. deal on U.S. military realignment package
- Nago Mayor demands the withdrawal of the Henoko plan to Foreign Minister, who is driving it as the site for the Futenma relocation
- Okinawa Governor travels to the United States to demand the relocation of Futenma Air Station out of the prefecture
New realignment plan for moving U.S. Marine to Guam will not be tolerated – the situation must not go from bad to worse